The Allegation

​

A former childcare worker was charged over her involvement in a heroin supply syndicate known as the “City Boys” operating across Sydney.

The prosecution alleged that:

• she participated in the supply of heroin as part of an organised criminal group

• she acted as a delivery driver distributing drugs to customers

• the operation supplied heroin daily using a coordinated system

The Crown case framed the offending as part of a structured and ongoing drug network.

​

The Reality of the Case

The Court heard that the accused’s role was limited within the broader syndicate.

Evidence established that:

• she worked as a delivery driver, transporting heroin to customers

• the operation used a centralised system where orders were received and passed on to drivers

• the drugs were distributed in small, packaged quantities on a regular basis

• she was not involved in directing or organising the syndicate

The Court accepted that she was a lower-level participant, although her involvement was repetitive over time.

Her personal circumstances were also significant, including struggles with gambling addiction and her background in childcare work.

​

Our Defence Strategy

In cases involving organised drug supply, the defence focuses on role and mitigation.

Key areas include:

• clearly distinguishing the accused from higher-level organisers

• establishing that her role was limited to courier-type activities

• presenting evidence of personal vulnerability, including addiction

• demonstrating remorse and prospects of rehabilitation

The strategy is to reduce the case from organised criminality to limited participation and individual circumstances.

​

The Court’s Findings

The Court found that:

• the accused knowingly participated in the supply of heroin

• her conduct formed part of an organised syndicate

• however, she was not a principal offender and operated at a lower level

The Court also noted the repetitive nature of the offending while recognising her reduced role.

​

The Result

The accused avoided full-time imprisonment.

Instead, the Court imposed a non-custodial outcome, reflecting:

• her lower-level involvement

• her personal circumstances

• her prospects of rehabilitation

​

Why This Case Matters

This case highlights an important principle in criminal law:
Courts carefully distinguish between levels of involvement in organised crime.

It reinforces that:

• not all participants in a drug syndicate are treated equally

• lower-level roles can significantly reduce sentencing outcomes

• personal circumstances, including addiction, can carry substantial weight

​

Our Expertise

At Abbas & Co Lawyers, we act in serious criminal matters including:

• drug supply and trafficking charges

• organised crime prosecutions

• sentencing and mitigation advocacy

• cases involving addiction and personal circumstances

We know how to:

• identify limited roles in complex syndicates

• challenge the prosecution’s characterisation of involvement

• present strong mitigation evidence

• achieve outcomes that reflect the true circumstances of the case

Speak to Us

If you or a loved one is facing serious drug charges, early legal advice is critical.

These matters carry significant penalties but can be strongly defended with the right strategy.

Contact Abbas & Co Lawyers to discuss your options.